The general rule is the fact a donor’s right to reward is unrestricted. As founded in the case of Ranee Khajoorunissa vs. Mst. Roushan Jahan (1876), the Privy Council recognised that a donor may perhaps reward all or any part of their property, although it adversely influences the expectant heirs. https://covenants-and-land-use-re66727.fare-blog.com/31261175/transfer-of-property-advocate-in-karachi-can-be-fun-for-anyone